Insurer Can't Flush Away Its Duty to Defend
By A Mystery Man Writer
Description
In a recent opinion, the Northern District Court of Illinois reaffirmed the bedrock principle that an insurer’s duty to defend is broad and triggered by any allegations in a complaint that potentially fall within a policy’s coverage grant. In Harleysville Pref. Ins. Co. v. Dude Products Inc., et. al., Case No. 21-c-5249 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 21, 2022), the insured, Dude Products, Inc., sought coverage from its insurer, Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company, against a class action lawsuit that alleged Dude Products intentionally and falsely marketed its wipes as “flushable” even though the product allegedly did not break apart and caused “clogs and other sewage damage.”
What to Do When a Car Insurance Company Refuses to Pay
What to Do When a Car Insurance Company Refuses to Pay
Bernie Sanders - Wikipedia
Insurance Hunton Retail Law Resource
Class Action Hunton Retail Law Resource
All dressed up and no duty to defend
20 DIY Hacks to Make Your Home Theft-Proof
Lawrence J. Bracken II - Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP - Experts - Lexology
Bad Faith of Insurer - Failure to Defend
Defences to a Claim of Unjust Enrichment
Lawrence J. Bracken II - Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP - Experts - Lexology
from
per adult (price varies by group size)