Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
By A Mystery Man Writer
Description
Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89. from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Frontiers Bomb Radiocarbon, Otolith Daily Increments and Length
Monthly percentage of opaque edges observed in modern samples of
Criticism - e-flux
Sand Whiting
Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size
Biometrics of Aquatic Animals
Schematic thin section of a plaice otolith with indication of the
PDF) Using Otolith Shape Analysis to Identify Different Stocks of
Frontiers Bomb Radiocarbon, Otolith Daily Increments and Length
Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula: Validation of otolith-based age
from
per adult (price varies by group size)